Dear Mr.Chad,
I am writing this letter to you in regarding the last training I participated in order to be qualified for my job as a lifeguard.
For once I must say, your course was extremely helpful. Your teaching was interesting and all of your lessons were easy to remember. I never thought I could be able to performing CPR with such excellent precision before. The school facilities were also in good state and all regularly maintenaced. Although I cause you and the staffs some problems, you guys still treat me gently and guide me through my mistakes.
But sadly the program's schedule was very exhausting. The classes were arranged too closely together. In theory it worked great, however there won't be enough space if the number of attendance increase. And more importantly, the session shouldn't end during rush hour. I hope these negative got taken into account and resolved in future.
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your own opinion and include relevant examples 73
- The graph below compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web
- You have recently participated in a training course Write a letter and give feedback to the organiser Give details about the course What did you like about the course Give some suggestions for improvement 20
- The chart below shows global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013
- the expenditure on fast food by income groups UK 1990 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Chad
Dear Mr.Chad, I am writing this letter to you in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: YOUR[1]
Message: Did you mean 'you're' or 'you are'?
Suggestion: You're; You are
...say, your course was extremely helpful. Your teaching was interesting and all of you...
^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ease. And more importantly, the session shouldnt end during rush hour. I hope these nega...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ive got taken into account and resolved in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 5.60731707317 357% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 753.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95394736842 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70796218779 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.743421052632 0.547539520022 136% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.474433944 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.4545454545 112.824112599 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8181818182 22.9334400587 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117932857586 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0323112005229 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538683993984 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843463252044 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656586104058 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 61.2550243902 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.