The line graph illustrates the rate of people who expended their leisure time on 4 activities in the USA over the period of 30 years.
In general, What stands out from the line graph is that there were two opposite trends for these 5 figures. While Reading, surfing, hiking and watching TV engaged more elderly people after 30 years, the opposite was true for Theatre. Besides, hiking was an activity which was spent almost all the time by older people in the USA.
Starting at a quite high point, the proportion of people watching TV from the beginning to the 2000s,then, instead of continuing to increase, that figure declined at about 68% in the 2010s. Following that, there was significant waves a fifth in the figure for Reading in the 2000s, after taking off at 60% and higher than that at the first time. Similarly, the percentage of surfing the internet always went up enormously during 30 years.
On the other hand, Theatre was the only activity which had a decline trend. The proportion of people who surfed the internet had a high point at starting time,however, it reached its lowest point in the next 30 years. In contrast, a remarkable rise and not oscillations was witnessed in the percentage of hiking, with the highest point in the last year of period
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 73
- The Graph Below Shows The Average Number Of Vietnamese Students Studying In France America And Russia Between 2000 And 2015 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison 73
- Task 1 The charts below give information about the price of tickets on one airline between Sydney and Melbourne Australia over a two week period in 2013 11
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , however
...ternet had a high point at starting time,however, it reached its lowest point in the nex...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, similarly, then, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1060.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77477477477 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52944673862 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3827114368 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108157525182 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436646047063 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340055932458 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731114908431 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222599686919 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.