The given graph illustrates the kind of activities done by pensioners in their spare time from 1980 to 2010 in the USA.
Overall, from the graph, it is clear that the activities listed rose popularity amongst the older. We can also see that hiking activity was the most favored over the period of 20 years while the choice of going to the theatre was the most unpopular activity.
From 1980 to 1990, the percentage of hiking expended considerably, which was from 20% to 40%. While reading, watching TV, and surfing the internet rose gradually, which was 40%, and 10% orderly. By contrast, only going to the theatre fell remarkably, which was from 50% to 30%
From 1990 to 2000, watching TV, going hiking, going to the theatre, and surfing the internet increased gradually, which was 70%, 60%, 40%, and 15% orderly. By contrast, the percentage of old people reading in their leisure time plummeted to 20%.
From 2000 to 2010, going hiking was the most choice for elderly, people, which was 80%. The second was watching Tv despite falling to 65% in 2010. It was followed by reading, surfing the internet, and going to the theatre, which was 60%,50%, and 45% orderly.
.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007 84
- The graph below shows how elderly people in the United States spent their free time between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 69
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 260, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...re, which was 60%,50%, and 45% orderly. .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 984.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87128712871 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42330487416 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509900990099 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.482926829268 1242% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2684161746 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.2 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0613339723865 0.215688989381 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388622728352 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500122701413 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0541994689713 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536089154576 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.