The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period.
The bar chart compares the expenditure of Asia, Europe and the USA for five different types of entertainment in 1995 and 2000.
It is clear from the graph that the figures for the USA were by far highest during the research period. Additionally, Asia, Europe, the USA all experienced increases in their figures.
In 1995, 184 billion dollars was spent by the USA people for entertainment purpose and publishing accounted for the largest amount, at around 75 billion dollars. Meanwhile, the figures for Europe and Asia were significantly lower, at 97 and 67 billion dollars respectively. While approximately 40 billion dollars was spent on publishing by European, the number for Asia was slightly lower, at around 30 billion dollars.
In 2000, the figure for the USA was still highest, at over 250 billion dollars, while the amounts of money spent by Asian and European were considerably lower, at 110 billion and 131 billion dollars respectively. Additionally, the amounts of money Asia, Europe and the USA spent on cinema were lowest, at under 10 billion dollars each. Likewise, only 15 billion dollars were spent on video in Europe, compared to around 10 billion dollars in Asia.
- The table shows the percentage of workers in agriculture manufacturing and services in 7 European countries in 2014 70
- Some people think it is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment for people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education 76
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant 81
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 79
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10769230769 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79797052401 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5786823163 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88888888889 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129225262515 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655235848524 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416241649154 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889089303262 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022139491344 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.