The bar graph provides the information about the funds spend on various form of entertainment by individuals of three nation. The year under consideration between 1995 and 2000.
Overall, it is crystal clear that America invest maximum amount of money in world entertainment markets over a five period time as compared to Asia and Europe.
At the first glance, it can be clearly seen that in 1995, United States spent on five different forms of fun was registered the highest value that accounted about 184 billion people. It was followed by Europe, having proportion of 97 billion. 67 were recorded in the case of Asian public. However, people from three nation in 1995 spent most of money on publishing and television was maximum in 2000. Whereas, they show less interest in music, video and cinema.
Further towards, in 2000, number of individuals slight raise in all nation those spend funds for entertainment. In America, people were increased about 257 while gap of 35 billion European can seen. Individual from Asia were inclined by 110 billion.
- Writing task 1 The Car Ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 78
- The bar graph below shows the number of tourists visiting two different cities by season Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- 1 In the last century when a human astronaut first arrived on the Moon he said it is a big step for mankind but some people think it makes little difference to our daily life To what extent to you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money making attractions aimed at tourists Others however believe that is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...f entertainment by individuals of three nation. The year under consideration between 1...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'nation' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'nations'.
Suggestion: nations
...sian public. However, people from three nation in 1995 spent most of money on publishi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...s interest in music, video and cinema. Further towards, in 2000, number of individuals...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...seen. Individual from Asia were inclined by 110 billion.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03428571429 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64034629763 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674285714286 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7708582905 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0909090909 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9090909091 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238918841978 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691418513487 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664679104629 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132122459228 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792345562456 0.0819641961636 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.