The graph reveals information about expenses for five different types of recreational activities in Asia, Europe and United States in 1995 and 2000.
It is clear that the amount of money which people spent for recreational activities in each area increased throughout the entire period. Overall, Americans always spent more money than the total of Asians and Europeans and Asians always was the least. In addition, publishing, television and music were the most popular entertainments, whilst cinema and video were the lesser forms.
In 1995, Americans spent totally $184 billion in recreational activities. The figures for Europe and Asia were significantly lower, at $97 billion and $67 billion respectively. Obviously, the expenses for cinema, video and music in three areas were approximately $20-$25 billion and the Americans spent much more money on publishing and television than Europeans and Asians.
By 2000, while the expenditures of Europeans and Asians rose gradually, the figure for Americans was higher, at $257 billion, mostly doubled Europeans and more than total of Asians and Europeans.
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period. write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below. write at least 150 words. 56
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period. 84
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five year period write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below write at least 150 words 42
- The graph below shows how money was spent on different forms of entertainment over a five-year period. write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below. write at least 150 words. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46470588235 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91784273537 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0435310006 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.125 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12364250968 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588866460331 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448536263754 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793929477191 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400630953068 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.