The bar chart compares the amount of money paid for 5 types of leisure activities in Asia, Europe, and the USA from 1995 to 2000. In general, the highest amount of money expended on entertainment facilities in the United States while the least amount was used in Asia.
Turning to details, in 1995, 184 dollars went for 5 amusing activities in the USA, whilst the number was 67 dollars in Asia, lower than one-fifth percent in America. Europe holds 97 billion of total expenses. In 2000, three mentioned areas experienced a significant increase in the total expenses. By the ways, much more money was spent on amusement by Americans, at 257 dollars in total.
Besides, the most popular activities in all three regions were publishing and watching TV, whilst the less popular one was cinema throughout the whole period. To be more specific, over 70% of the total amount was purchased for the two prominent types of entertainment, and lower than 20 percent was used for cinema, video, and music amusement in the same five-year period.
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both view and give your own opi 11
- In school and universities girls tend to choose art while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 89
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the types of music albums purchased by people in Britain according to sex and age Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below You should write at leas 56
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, while, in general, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 861.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89204545455 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61274070622 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0435747624 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168351054081 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664866816908 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584673752234 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108328978067 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380169394353 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.