The graph provides information about changes in the amount of wastes collected through three selected methods of waste disposal in a European country between 2005 and 2008.
According to the graph, most of the wastes were disposed by landfill method in 2005 while, the amount of waste burned were less in 2008. Approximately, two thousand million tonnes of wastes were discarded by landfill method in 2005, whereas the figure showed a successive significant fall by 400 million tonnes in 2006 and 2008 respectively.
Although the amount of waste burned were nine hundred million tonnes in 2005, it increased slightly to one thousand two hundred million tonnes in 2006, furthur decreasing dramatically to nine hundred million tonnes in 2008. However, the waste dumped in sea have been increased by two hundred million tonnes in 2006 and 2008 from 1200 million tonnes in 2005.tonnes in 2008. However, the wastes dumped in sea have been successively increased by two hundred million tonnes in 2006 and 2008 from 1200 million tonnes in 2005.
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. 67
- It is suggested that all the young adults should undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people? 56
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008 87
- All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., whereas the figure showed a successive significant fall by 400 million tonnes i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1775147929 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59851584253 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437869822485 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1113514024 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305765041812 0.215688989381 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20212054946 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117779891059 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271742767723 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123745587056 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.2329268293 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.