The graph below shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1973 and the price of black and white television and color television during the same period

Essay topics:

The graph below shows Japanese average monthly salary (Yen) from 1953 to 1973, and the price of black and white television and color television during the same period.

The diagram illustrates how much money Japanese people earn a month between 1953 and 1973 and compares two TV types’ cost simultaneously. Overall, it is clear that there were significant changes in the Japanese earning per month while the price of color television and black and white television declined over the time.

Looking at the chart in more detail, with regard to monthly salary, the figure experienced a dramatic rise throughout the research period. Starting at just below 50 thousands yen in 1953, the trend of Japanese income increased marginally by one fourth in the 10 following years. It is followed by the noticeable growth from 1963 to 1973 and hit the peak at approximately 200 thousands yen.

As for the TV’s price, the figure depicted a substantial decrease throughout 30 years. A striking point to not is that the price of black and white television stood at 200 thousand yen at the beginning of this period, but it had a tendency to drop sharply by more than one hundred thousands in the following years. In comparison with the aforementioned kind of TV, figure for color TV’s cost followed a different pattern. It is notable that even color TV was invented in 1963, the next five years is the time of its decreasing price by a half thousand and its figure continued to fall down until the end of this period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-12-10 JolieNguyen 84 view
Essays by user JolieNguyen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ed thousands in the following years. In comparison with the aforementioned kind of TV, fig...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, while, as for, kind of, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82683982684 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7280628279 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9912422893 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.888888889 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278753309911 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1089736969 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803710817138 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193293837341 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713866431558 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.