The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transportation and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010.
The diagrams illustrate how the numbers of vehicles on the road, including both public and private transportation, changed from 2000 to 2010 in some particular Australian cities. Overall, it is clear that there was significant differences in the volume of cars, compared to public transport and Sydney stood on the top of the vehicles volume.
Looking at the information in more detail, in terms of public transportation, Sydney took the lead as regards the highest percentage over the research period, ranging from 20% to one fourth. It is followed by Melbourne which stood at 18% in the beginning of 21st century and then fluctuated in the next following years. Figures for Perth showed a marginal increase before falling to just under 0.15 in 2010. In addition, after Brisbane and Adelaide hit the lowest point at 11% in 2006 and 8% in 2004 respectively, the mentioned figures experienced a margin increase.
In the aspect of private cars, more Sydney citizens than Melbourne chose to transport by cars. The striking point to note is that the percentage of Melbourne grew dramatically to approximate 90% in 2010 but it was slightly less than Sydney during 10-year period. As for the remaining areas, there were some similarities between Brisbane and Adelaide in terms of a rise by 10% from 2002 in the next 8 following years. Furthermore, Perth’s trend climbed dramatically to 82% in 2008. By 2010, it had soared marginally by 2%.
- The table below shows the information about the percentages of the first year university students rating at very good about 5 aspects of their course in 2003 85
- The graph below shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1973 and the price of black and white television and color television during the same period 84
- Some people think that government should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activities Discuss both view and give your own opinion 56
- The line graph gives information on the cinema attendance in the UK
- The graphs below show the percentages of people using public transportation and private cars in different cities in Australia between 2000 and 2010 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'vehicles'' or 'vehicle's'?
Suggestion: vehicles'; vehicle's
...port and Sydney stood on the top of the vehicles volume. Looking at the information in ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, look, so, then, as for, as regards, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 239.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03347280335 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89856406522 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585774058577 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8107495088 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.363636364 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161163791883 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556790783886 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042065027558 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110649613011 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443142693002 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.