The line graph provides information about the quantity of books read by males and females at the Burnaby Public Library between 2011 and 2014.
Overall, the number of books read by men increased steadily but substantially over time, whereas the proportion of books read by women experienced a decline near the end of the given period, despite initially exceeding their male counterparts.
In 2011, the books read by men totaled around 3000, much lower than the sum of books read by women. This figure saw an increase of about 1000 a year later, before rising drastically to more or less 14000 by the end of the three-year period.
On the other hand, females read almost 5000 books in 2011. This statistic continued to climb gradually over the years and finally peaked at nearly 10000 books in 2013. However, by 2014 their reading experienced a slight decline, returning to the same value as it had been in the previous year.
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- You have recently moved to a different house Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter Explain why you have moved Describe the new house Invite your friend to come and visit 73
- High stakes English language tests such as IELTS are increasingly being delivered on the computer Do the advantages of computer based testing outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowl 95
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 88
- The responsibility of bringing up children should be shared equally between mother and father To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, whereas, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87421383648 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49724344686 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654088050314 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0005775864 43.030603864 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25273226826 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123637631831 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956881428937 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171244465501 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0843903505993 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.