The given line graph provide the information about the number of books which is read by male and female at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 till 2014.
It is clear that graph for men shows constant increase while graph for women decrease in certain point.
Looking at the graph in more details, the amount of books that men read in 2011 was just above 2,000. In 2012, the number of book in men category increased which was almost 4,000. After that, in 2013 the value dramatically increased to 10,000. And it peaked at 14,000 in 2014.
On the other hand, figure of women was over 4,000 which is approximately 2,000 higher than men. It reached 8,000 in 2012 with maintaining majority. However, the number was same with men which is 10,000 in 2013. And it was the highest value of all years. After that period, it suddenly dropped to 8,000 which is same amount as in 2012.
- Some people think all lawbreakers should be put into prison, while others believe that there are better alternatives. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 61
- the diagram below shows the process of milk production 56
- Countries becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 718.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57324840764 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.16687860644 2.65546596893 82% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 194.4 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.985275538 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.2727272727 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.2727272727 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54545454545 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236112819657 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943911886742 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10721773961 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181592085075 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118298664734 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 13.2329268293 54% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 91.11 61.2550243902 149% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.0 10.3012195122 39% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.63 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.