Essay topics: The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

Essay topics: The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The given bar charts show the information about what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not work for full-time did after leaving a college in 2008. It is clear that most students choose to study more for both graduate and postgraduate students. And the least student worked as volunteer.

second large proportion of graduates went into part-time work. Similar but third large rate of student was unemployed. The number of students who work for part-time was only approximately 1,000 bigger than the number of unemployed students which is 16,235. A lot different from this circumstance, a number of students who worked as volunteer occupied only 3,500.

same as graduate students, second large proportion of postgraduates was also part-time worker. However, not like graduates, the gap between the rate of part-time work section and unemployment section was big. A number of students who did voluntary work was smallest as same as graduate students.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-18 Noah1997 56 view
2020-01-07 pateldhruv1708 61 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 89 view
2019-12-24 rm21co 67 view
2019-12-07 MHT 78 view
Essays by user ymj02266 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar charts show the information about what UK graduate a...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
... least student worked as volunteer. second large proportion of graduates went into...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Same
...d as volunteer occupied only 3,500. same as graduate students, second large prop...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, third

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 813.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3137254902 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88510087913 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575163398693 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4454641426 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318122894263 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140258254811 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142291644138 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.243089293147 0.15604864568 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137281902673 0.0819641961636 167% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.