The graph below shows the number of hours Canadian spend on watching TV from 1990-2001.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and comparison where relevant.
The provided charts illustrate the number of hours Canadian individuals devote on viewing television from 1990 to 200.The data has been calibrated into numbers.
Overall it is clearly seen that canadian people spent maximum hours on per week on watching TV in the first year, whereas minimum hours in per week of television viewing by adults.
Now looking at the details, between 1991 and 19 94, the Individuals of Canada were spending hours on TV watching decreased constantly, which started at 23 and ended at abroximately 22.5.However, there was sudden increase observed from 1994 to 1995, which accounted to nearly 23. In 1995 and 1997, the value of devoting are by canadian people was again dropped, which came to around 22.8.After that number of hours per week spent on viewing television were changed intermittently from 1998 to 2001, which registered nearly 21.
Probing ahead, in 1991 and 2001, average hours of TV viewing per week by children stood at almost 20. Meanwhile, 12 to 17 age group devote mediate hours on television per week was approximately 15.Moreover, the similarity was seen between adults and 25 - 34 age group Canadian, which accounted to almost 15.Unlike 35-49 was increased gradually, which was nearly 20.Additionally, 50-59age group and golden age people of Canada spent most of their hours on watching TV per week, which was well above 15.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-02 | Manjinder_kaur | 79 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | Manjinder_kaur | 73 | view |
- Students today can access information online so libraries are not necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Students today can access information online so libraries are not necessary To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The graph below shows the number of hours Canadian spend on watching TV from 1990 2001 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and comparison where relevant 73
- Some people think that nowadays children have too much freedom Do you agree or disagree 61
- Recent advancement in technology have made the TV screen so live that people donot feel to go for any live performance To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... on viewing television from 1990 to 200.The data has been calibrated into numbers. ...
^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
...ed at 23 and ended at abroximately 22.5.However, there was sudden increase observed fro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...gain dropped, which came to around 22.8.After that number of hours per week spent on ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...TV viewing per week by children stood at almost 20. Meanwhile, 12 to 17 age group...
^^
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...while, 12 to 17 age group devote mediate hours on television per week was approxi...
^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...elevision per week was approximately 15.Moreover, the similarity was seen between adults...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Unlike
... Canadian, which accounted to almost 15.Unlike 35-49 was increased gradually, which wa...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Additionally
...ncreased gradually, which was nearly 20.Additionally, 50-59age group and golden age people o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, look, moreover, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77563095224 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 22.4926829268 164% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.9264764749 43.030603864 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 191.666666667 112.824112599 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.5 22.9334400587 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161244226274 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101000552589 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027141156125 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117106925792 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0231258155463 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 13.2329268293 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.9970731707 153% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.