The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010.
The line graph is illustrates how much period of time does children view television in a day from 1950 to 2010.
Overall, it can be manifested that in the initial time children were not merely interested in watching T.V. but as time passes it encounter the upward trend.
To initiate with, in 1950, the hours spent in watching T. V. Was approximately 20 minute. Then, after 10 years, the viewing period rose, albeit slowly, in a constant rate to reach nearly 45 minutes in a day. During 1960-1970, the time spent by children in front of television was cross by one hour with the figures around 1.5 hours. The period of children viewing T. V. rose significantly to hit 4 hours per day in the year 1980.
Secondly. It was observed that there was slight fall in time of children in front of T.V. yet increase to reach to 4 hours between 1980 and 1990. In following years, there was sustain aggravate in watching time to hit the peak 4 hours and 5 minute. After that, there was noticable downward trend in screen time of children to reach nearly 3.5 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-24 | sharad patel | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Ismoilkhon | view | |
| 2021-03-20 | Cuberates | 84 | view |
- The graph shows data on the manufacture of passenger cars in 2015
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down other however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals 56
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 78
- The charts below show the percentage of food budgets the average Australian family spent on restaurant meals in different years The graph shows the number of meals eaten in fast food restaurants and sit down restaurants 87
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph is illustrates how much period of time does children vi...
^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...The line graph is illustrates how much period of time does children view television in a day ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encounters'?
Suggestion: encounters
... in watching T.V. but as time passes it encounter the upward trend. To initiate with, ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he period of children viewing T. V. rose significantly to hit 4 hours per day in ...
^^^
Line 7, column 177, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sustained'.
Suggestion: sustained
...and 1990. In following years, there was sustain aggravate in watching time to hit the p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... minute. After that, there was noticable downward trend in screen time of childre...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56020942408 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46838511669 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560209424084 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5042595454 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.1818181818 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.81818181818 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275048491091 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114220117343 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08492067998 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169619750914 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831370704554 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.88 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.