the graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to there different areas in the European country between 1987 and 2007
The graph provides data on foreigners visiting three regions in a European nation within 20 years. From an overall perspective, the rate of visitors to three areas all witnessed a rise between 1987 and 2007, and the lakes area had the most rapid and exceptional changes in the time period.
In 1987, standing at 10 thousand, the lakes welcomed the least tourists among of 3 places. However, they observed an intense growth in the next 10 years, as the number of oversea visitors had grown times as much as it was. The figure kept going up until its rapid rise in 1997 and peaked in 2002 at around 75 thousand people before dropping dramatically 5 years later to only 50 thousand.
The coastal region had the most travelers in 1987 with 40 thousand of visits. Even though its figure slightly fell five years later, it witnessed a stable and strong upward trend from then to 2007. The mountains area is different from the others, as it was the only one with a moderated and steady growth in 20 years
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...d a rise between 1987 and 2007, and the lakes area had the most rapid and exceptional...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mountains'' or 'mountain's'?
Suggestion: mountains'; mountain's
...ong upward trend from then to 2007. The mountains area is different from the others, as i...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58659217877 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37304600382 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642458100559 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6826288269 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202625916643 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765552156609 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584080038675 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131408823593 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660991041521 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.