The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different places european country between 1987 and 2007

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different places european country between 1987 and 2007

The line graph illustrates the number of non-natives of Europe who visited to three areas (the coast, the mountains and the lakes) which were located at European country amid of 1987 to 2007. Noticeable, the data has been calibrated by thousands.

In an overview, although all areas visitors' figure followed upward trend, at the end the coast was considered a popular visiting area.

After having a glimpse it can be clearly seen that the highest overseas travellers(40) explored the coast in initial year, the counting of tourist slightly decreased in the next year; however a gradual upsurge had been witnessed and it hit the peakest point in 2007, that was more than 70.

In term of mountains, the account of travellers was topsyturvey as it fluctuated in the range of 20 and 30 thousands from 1987 to 2007, while in the last five years visitors' counting rose and then constant at 35 thousands.

Probing further, only 10 thousands overseas visitors had visited the lakes in 1987. The speed of its increment was moderate till 2000, before declining in 2007 the lakes had maximum visitors than that of others which was 75 thousands during 2002.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-23 amrit5310 78 view
Essays by user amrit5310 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end, at the end the coast was considered a popular visiting area. After having...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, then, while, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94845360825 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.581172378 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634020618557 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.2461433067 43.030603864 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.142857143 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196817360961 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0871159305264 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768436707721 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100335350039 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669364130776 0.0819641961636 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.