The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 (1)
The line graph compares the number of foreign visitors to three types of natural landscapes in a particular European country over a 20-year period from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, while significantly more foreign travellers visited the lakes and the mountains, the influx of tourists to the coast saw a less dramatic rise with wild fluctuations during the timescale.
In the year 1987, there were 40.000 visitors went to the coast. This figure was higher than the number of overseas tourists who paid a visit to series 3 and the lakes and mountains, at 20.000 and 10.000 respectively. Nevertheless, the period from 1987 to 2002 witnessed an exponential jump in the number of foreign visitors to the lakes and the mountains as it peaked at 75.000 people in 2002. Besides, the number of visitors to coastal areas considerably rose to 62.000 people. In addition, there was a fluctuation in the figure for people travelling to series 3 and reaching around 25.000 in 2002.
In the year 2007, the number of overseas travellers to the lake and the mountain was highest, at about 65.000 compared to 55.000 of people visiting the coast and about 35.000 of visitors to series 3.
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups inone town who rode bicycles in 2011 61
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 67
- The chart below shows the waste disposal in 1 European country in four years 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008. 61
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, nevertheless, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89898989899 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71042307125 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530303030303 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2909875135 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.25 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208633709311 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10431283758 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0945949663887 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140224349954 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114822824659 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.