The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007.
The line graph illustrates the figure for foreign travellers to three different zones of one European country in the period from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the number of overseas visitors to three regions all increased during most of the period, though some fluctuations. The lake and the mountain were destinations which most visited by international tourists.
In the year 1987, there were 40.000 visitors went to the coast. This figure was higher than the number of overseas tourists paid a visit to series 3 and the lakes and mountains, at 20.000 and 10.000 respectively. By 2002, the number of people who travelled to the coast rose to 62.000. However, this was overtaken by the figure for those who visited the lakes and mountains, which increased dramatically to reach a peak of 75.000. In addition, there was a fluctuation in the figure for people travelling to series 3 and reaching around 25.000 in 2002.
Between 2002 and 2007, the numbers visiting the lakes and mountains declined steadily to about 66.000 at the end of the period. After peaking at 75.000, the figure for visitors from abroad to the coast went down to 55.000 in 2007. By contrast, series 3 saw an upward trend in the number of foreign visitors and reached a peak of 35.000 in 2007.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | jolene04121998 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Dieulinh | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 73
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 1 82
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007. 56
- The diagram below shows the changes of a village in 1995 and now. 67
- The best way to resolve international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1047.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84722222222 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60805162891 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518518518519 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4208100983 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1818181818 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.23603664747 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209782479758 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897289608686 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842682134079 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157518994231 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858945637836 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.