The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas of a European country between 1987 and 2007

The line graph depicts the quantity of over seas tourist to three natural landscapes in a specific country over the period of 20 years. Overall, the number of overseas travelers to the coast the mountains and the lakes surged significantly during the years shown. The people who listened the coast was higher than those to two left areas apart from the year 2002. In 1987, there were 40 thousand foreigners visiting the coast. This number was the highest. From 1987 to 1992, there was a slight plunge in the number of overseas visitors to the coast meanwhile overseas visitors to the coast to 35 thousands. The figure for the lake rose relatively, the opposite trend was for those to the lakes witnessed an upward trend in its tourists. In contrast, the number of tourists came to the coast surged dramatically, peak at 75 thousand tourists. In 2002, the lake’s tourists peak at the top until went down moderately to 50 thousand tourists in 2007. The tourists came to the mountains oscillation slightly to 35 thousand tourists in 2007. There was always the lowest from two others.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: OVER_SEAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overseas'?
Suggestion: overseas
The line graph depicts the quantity of over seas tourist to three natural landscapes in ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 973, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mountains'' or 'mountain's'?
Suggestion: mountains'; mountain's
...rists in 2007. The tourists came to the mountains oscillation slightly to 35 thousand tou...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, apart from, as for, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82258064516 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52636119095 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52688172043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.1541350601 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5454545455 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9090909091 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1688794063 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621883663343 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564469530624 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1688794063 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.