The line graph represents the quantity of overseas travelers to 3 different natural landscapes in Europe from 1987 to 2007.
Overall, the number of overseas tourists to the coast, the mountain and the lakes surged significantly during the years shown. In addition, the people who visited the coast was higher than those to two others except for the year 2002.
In 1987, there were 40 thousand foreigners visiting the coast. This number was the highest. From 1987 to 1992, there was a slight plunge in the number of overseas visitors to the coast while overseas visitors to the coast to 35 thousands. The figure for the lake rose relatively, the opposite trend was for those to the lakes witnessed an upward trend in its tourists. In contrast, the number of tourists came to the coast surged substantially, peak at 75 thousands tourists. In 2002, The lake's tourist numbers peaked until tanked relative to 50 thousand tourists in 2007. The tourists came to the mountains volatile slightly to 35 thousands tourists in 2007. There was always the lowest from two others.
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task More and more people no longer read newspapers or watch TV programs to get news They get news about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development You should write at least 250 word 61
- WORKING AGE ADULTS IN FOUR COUNTRIES 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh 73
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, as for, as to, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 892.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95555555556 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55666642523 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527777777778 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.703554468 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0909090909 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177373185422 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740741884332 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0752945995209 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140038927616 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728591616966 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.