The given line graph illustrates a comparison of three kinds of foreign tourists visiting to three various areas during a 20-year period, starting from 1987 and ending in 2007.
Overall, it is evident that the amout of tourists visiting the coasts was highest and the figure for the mountains was lowest. Additionally, the number of visitors visiting all three places witnessed an upward trend throughtout this time frame.
To begin, over 40 thousands people flocked to coastal locations in 1987. There was a slight decline of 5 thousands visitors who visits the European's shores, after which a gradual growth in the number of tourists outside Europe visiting its shore. Meanwhile, the amount of the international visitors who visits the mountain locations in Europe is over 20 thousands, then there was a slight increase in this figure to over 30 thousands in 2002 and then jumped into 35 thousands in 2007
Moving to the lakes, for the first fifteen years, starting from 1987, the figure for the people living outside Europe who visits this continent’s lakes rose dramatically and reached a peak of 75 thousands tourists, at which point this figure started to fell sharply, reaching 50 thousands visitors.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 67
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football While other people think that taking part in individual sports is better like tennis or swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010 73
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15656565657 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65068770158 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 155.805077652 43.030603864 362% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.166666667 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144364742874 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833807767299 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642609880312 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976470129229 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651272996237 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.24 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.