The given line chart compares three different areas in terms of overseas visitors in a European country over a period of 20 years starting from 1987.
Obviously, the figure of foreign visitors to the coast consistently ranked first. Coast and mountains saw a growth in overseas travelers; meanwhile, lakes experienced a downward trend.
From the beginning of the period, the coast dominated others with 40 thousands. The year 1992 witnessed an identical figure of lakes and mountains at 25 thousands. Over a period of 10 years starting from 1987, the number of overseas visitors rose significantly in lakes and coast to 40 and 50 thousands respectively; for the time being, mountains fluctuated between 20 and 30 thousands.
Starting with a peak at approximately 75 thousands, lakes experienced a sharp decrease in abroad visitors to 50 thousands in the years from 2002 to 2007. During the same period, the mountains went up considerably to around 35 thousands. At the end of period, coast took the lead with 75 thousands.
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 61
- The widespread use of the Internet has brought many problems What do you think are the main problems associated with the use of the web What solutions can you suggest 61
- The graph below shows the percentage of workers from five different European countries that were absent for a day or more due to illness from 1991 to 2001 Summarise the information by selecting reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva 60
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to Increase the cost of fuel To what extent Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays international tourism is the biggest industry in the world Unfortunately international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10714285714 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98322977056 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.1528229098 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.77777777778 5.23603664747 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176735096843 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709683651178 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10245416777 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131034504136 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11603205163 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.