The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018.
The line graph illustrates the number of stores opening and closing in a single nation in 8 years, starting in 2011. Overall, it is clear that the number of shops opening and closing saw a fluctuation over the period of time. However, the number of shops opening was higher than that of stores closing in 2011.
In 2011, the number of outlets opening was 8500 stores, which was the highest during the time. After a considerable decline to 4000 in 2012, openings made a rebound in the next 2 years. The figure for cash and carries opening dropped slowly from 2000 in 2015, where it remained until it fell to an all-time at 3000 in 2018.
There was a vary in the number of outlets closed in the first 4 years of the period, reaching nearly the same level as openings in 2014. A considerable decrease was seen in closings to 500 stores in 2015, before rocketing to more 5000 shops in 2016. In the last two years, there was a stable number of shops closing, which was 5000 cash and carry.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-22 | Tường Vân | 89 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 70 | view |
| 2024-04-26 | 123456abcxyz | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-26 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | minhnhat2002 | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and closing saw a fluctuation over the period of time. However, the number of shops opening w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...all-time at 3000 in 2018. There was a vary in the number of outlets closed in the ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.45604395604 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.269869266 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 18.0171386172 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.34643729335 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16616536324 0.103423049105 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982465546808 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252717052314 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12481300179 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.