The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Carribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise he information y selecting nd reporting the main features and make comparisons where relavent

The line graph illustrates the statistics of the variated amount of visitor to a particular Carribean island from 2010 to 2017.
Overall, two types of visitors and their total had some variations, but all of them showed generally upward trends during 7 years.
At the beginning of the graph, the number of visitors staying on cruise ships was around 0.25 million of people while the number of those staying on island was approximately triple at about 0.75 million people. After 1 year, the cruise ships tourists figure had a sharply increase to 0.5 million. On the other hand, island staying visitors number tended to remain stable. Therefore, the total of them had a slight change from 1 million in 2010 to about 1.25 million in 2011.
From 2011 to 2012, there was a dramatically decline in the quantity of cruise ships choicer to reach the low point at around 0.5 million, after which started to rise gradually to the year 2015. In contrast, the figure of another factor showed a dramatically increase from three quarter of 1 million to about 1.25 million in 2012, and this was followed by a sharp incline to reach its peak at 1.5 million and stayed stable there to 2015. In general, the total showed an upward trend from 1.25 million to estimated 2.75 million in 2015, which was the most stable figure.
The visitor staying on cruise ships continued to rise sharply from 2015 to reach the peak at around 2 million in 2017 while at that time, another had a fluctuation, after staying stable for 3 years, it fell sharply to 1.25 million, at which point started to rise again to 1.5 million in 2017. During that period of time, the total figure showed a stable statistic when it remained 2.75 million people from 2015 to 2016, after which had a significantly increase to reach the highest point at 3.5 million people in 2017.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('sharply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...r, the cruise ships tourists figure had a sharply increase to 0.5 million. On the other hand, isla...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decline') instead of another adjective.
... in 2011. From 2011 to 2012, there was a dramatically decline in the quantity of cruise ships choicer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 243, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...st, the figure of another factor showed a dramatically increase from three quarter of 1 million to abou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 305, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ain to 1.5 million in 2017. During that period of time, the total figure showed a stable stati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 436, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...ople from 2015 to 2016, after which had a significantly increase to reach the highest point at 3.5 milli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, in contrast, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 33.7804878049 222% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 321.0 196.424390244 163% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70093457944 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3865571704 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.429906542056 0.547539520022 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0511475119 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.181818182 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1818181818 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0765125902499 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464874953944 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439149502167 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0674046320264 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557988670649 0.0819641961636 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.