The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The given line chart represents the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.

Overall, we can clearly observe that there is an increase in the total number of tourists visiting a Caribbean island over the years. The total visitors are divided into two categories, visitors staying on cruise ships and visitors who stayed on island respectively.

The number of visitors who stayed on island remained unchanged from 2010 to 2011. Then, the number increased in 2012 and 2013. After that, the total number of visitors remained the same till 2017 except for 2016. During the year 2016, the total number had a decline. Around 1.5 million of visitors stayed on island during year 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 respectively.

As the total number of tourists visiting the island between 2010 and 2017 increased, the number of visitors staying on cruise ships increased as well. It was the highest in 2017 with around 2.5 million visitors staying on cruise ships while it was lowest with around 0.25 million visitors on 2010 and 2012.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
then, well, while, except for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04519774011 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37442779847 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474576271186 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.872211759 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220192938044 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119999254247 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108089086626 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191248352529 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105753363129 0.0819641961636 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.