the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph demonstrates the quantity of visitors to a specific Caribbean island over the period of 7 years from 2010 to 2017. Overall, the total amount of visitors increased over the surveyed period. Specifically, the number of tourists stayed on cruise ships experienced an upward trend while the figure for those who stayed on land witnessed an opposite pattern.

Having looked at the line graph for more details, it is clear that from 2010 to 2011, there were no significant changes in the number on tourists who stayed on island, taking up roughly under a million people. The amount of visitors stayed on ships increased from a quarter to half units. Between 2011 to 2013, there was a notable rise in island visitors, reaching a peak at 1.5 million tourists in 2013. The figure for cruise ships visitors experienced a slight decrease of a half, followed by a slight soar to half million people in the year 2013. From 2013 to 2017, the number of tourists stayed on the island remained stable, stagnated at 1.5 units before falling slightly and rising to the initial peak in 2017. In contrast, the quantity of cruise ships tourists experienced a remarkable rise, reaching from a half to a peak at precisely 2 million people.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82075471698 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56581228199 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504716981132 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7540045749 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.555555556 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137139993949 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644600120201 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607409347229 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115213612709 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00170007599606 0.0819641961636 2% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.