The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The graph highlights how many tourists visited a specific Caribbean island over a 7-year period from 2010 to 2017. Number of tourists are measured in millions.

It is clear that, in year 2010, about 75 percent of total visitors (0.75 millions) decided to stay on island. After remaining constant for one year, that count doubled (1.5 millions) in year 2013 and remained steady over next 2 years untill 2015. Although, after one year, the trend of staying on island slightly decreased to approximately 1.25 millions, by end of the given period it again Rose and attained previous figure (1.5 millions).

With regards to tourists who stayed on cruise ship, in year 2010, their count was 0.25 millions which jumped in the next year and became double (0.5 millions). However, during year 2012, it declined and got intial count. After 2012, there was a drastic growth in visitors who liked to stay on cruise ships. In 2014, from total 2.5 millions visitors, 1 millions visitors lived on cruise ships. It is important to consider that, in final year, more than half of total tourists chose to live on the ships rather than on the island.

Overall, what stands out from the line chart is that the total number of visitors to Caribbean island is dramatically surged over given 7 years. additionally, trend of staying on cruise ships compared to staying on island significantly grew in that period of time.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...dramatically surged over given 7 years. additionally, trend of staying on cruise ships compa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ng on island significantly grew in that period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 238.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8781512605 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40965928655 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8820309023 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.75 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.916666666667 5.23603664747 18% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11394305024 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554104256418 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677031217987 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107850127955 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962631198373 0.0819641961636 117% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.