The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the number of students graduated from university, separated by gender, in Canada over a 16-year period, starting from 1992.
Overall, the number of male university graduates was far less than that of their counterparts. Additionally, both genders experienced an increase in the number of students graduated throughout the observed period.
More specifically, despite starting at over 70,000 students in 1992, the figure for male students graduated from university gradually increased and reached roughly 75,000 students in the next four years. However, the number of male graduated students witnessed a downward trend of about 4,000 students in 1999, followed by a rapid rise to over 95,000 students in the final research year.
Furthermore, their counterparts showed a similar trend, to begin with. Starting at approximately 105,000 students in 1995, the figure for female students slightly decreased and remained at 100,000 students in three consecutive years, from 1997 to 1999. However, its figure soon significantly rose by over 45,000 students at the end of the period.
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do disadvantages of this development for society outweigh advantages? 84
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant 84
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002, 2006 and 2010. 73
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 78
- US government expenditure on research 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89598737172 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9125495144 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119301494838 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067289785653 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503401770186 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982538316441 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519014590447 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.