It is widely argued that a vast majority of people has a strong tendency to drink sugar-related beverage. I personally assume the reasons for this issue are because, they not only are a provider of energy, but also a popular beverage among the young generation in every party. This essay will first give specific details to explain this and demonstrate some implementation of preventing people from consuming sugar-based drinks.
First of all, there is no room for doubt that sugar-related beverages provide people with an instantly great source of energy and enthusiasm to recharge their batteries. This is because a huge amount of sugar which is widely known as glucose is greatly decomposed into smaller substances to stimulate the brain function, and eventually help people to fully focus on their mundane workload. A research conducted by Oxford University has recently revealed that sugar-based drinks consumption gives people a strong sense of concentration to work for 10 consecutive hours without taking a break. Moreover, this kind of beverage is commonly drunk by teenagers in parties. Taking Vietnam as a prime example, it is roughly calculated that 78% of the young generation drink about 5 cans of Coca Cola or Pepsi during parties because they are fairly cheap.
The intervention of government and authorities should be taken into account to possibly decrease this trendy problem. Firstly, the government has an important role in breaking the habit of absorbing drinks containing sugar by enacting novel law on high taxation. For instance, by adopting this new implementation, the rate of Japanese citizens drinking this greatly dropped from 67% in 2017 to 45% in 2019. Furthermore, the idea of alternative beverages is supported by many local authorities. The Vietnamese drinking market, for example, has introduced a brand new type of energetic beverage called Glade which not only far cheaper than sugar-related drinks but also provides people with a wide range of vitamins and nutrition.
In conclusion, there are two main reasons why sugar-contained drinks are so popular with people. However, some solutions have also been introduced to keep this harmful beverage at bay.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95857581082 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614942528736 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.718237516 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250504053074 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813935514976 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582901682219 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15578268232 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384687037649 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.