The line graph demonstrates a differentiation between the number of graduate scholars in Canada in the middle of 1992 to 2007 which is made category in terms of gender.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that both followed a similar trend that is increasing. In the case of females, the number grew one and half times than the beginning value, while the rising value is true for males but not as much as females.
To begin with, in 1992, the number of men pupils was far less in comparison with females, while almost 100000 female students completed their graduation, at that time 70000 men succeeded to finish their university courses. Then up to 1995, the numerical value of both gender graduates increased. In the case of males, the number was approximately 77000 and 105000 for females, then over four years the value gradually decreased to 100000 and 71000 for female and male scholars respectively.
From 2000 to the rest of the time, the figure rose rapidly for females and slowly for the opposite gender. After 2002, every year almost 10000 female pupils finished their graduation and in 2007 the number rose to 148000. On the other hand, the figure of male graduates upgraded but not as fast as females but it ended at 95000.
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 62
- Some people think that in order to solve traffic and transportation problems people should be encouraged to live in cities rather than in suburbs or at countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1037.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80092592593 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48047502392 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1014140964 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.222222222 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155544559864 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669603568698 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523038639114 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106915894504 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522121796909 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.