The bar chart Illustrates the information about the number of people who visited to three different museums (MET - New York, EDO-Tokyo and National - China) in the given period from 2001 to 2005.
Overall it is clear from the chat at the highest number of visitors were seen in MET museum and EDO Museum in 2005 while, EDO Museum was figured highest in 2000 but, in 2005 it figured for lowest visitor in museum.
On the one hand, MET and EDO Museum was the most popular in 2000. After this, in 2001 the figure 4 EDO Museum remained unchanged at almost 14 million annual visitors. Furthermore, there was a gradual rose in the number of people who visited to National Museum and from that time onwards, this figure started to increase and reached its peak in 2005 and climbed up to 16 million annual visitors.
In contrast, MET museum was the second most popular in 2000 and remained famous as second in the end of period with well over 14 million visitors. Moreover, EDO Museum was experienced as highest in 2000 but, this figure started to decline from 2002 to 2004. After this, the number of visitors in National Museum increased and reached upto 10 million visitor in 2005.
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 91
- The bat chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information 69
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 67
- Some people think that the government should decide the subject for students to study in university Others believe that students should be allowed to apply for the subject they prefer Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67788461538 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29625051767 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485576923077 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6864828751 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189262681284 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998129308512 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564541585157 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140323043827 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380667288499 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.