The given line graph depicts the percentum of the adults enrolled in tertiary education in four countries from 1961to 2011.
Looking at the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the figures of the four given countries show a progressive trend during the period.
Having a glimpse at the illustration reveals that the figure of Singapore and Malaysia had some fluctuation over a period. As a quarter of Singapore, students were studied higher education in a former year compared to less than a fifth in Thailand. Several students rose considerably from 5 to 30 percents in the second year. Eventually, this figure reached more than 35 percents. Thailand students remained relatively steady till the year 1991. After upon, it grew up to 40 percents.
Shifting to the remaining data, the figure of the Philippines diverged generally from the Malaysian. Philippines students were more than 5 percents in the former year and remained similar till the year 1971. It grew consistently from the year 1981 and hitter 20 percents at the end. In addition, students of Malaysia underwent a more moderate increase in the given period. It started from less than five percentile and remained constant from the year 1991 to 2011.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sian Philippines students were more than 5 percents in the former year and remain...
^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'percentile' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'percentiles'.
Suggestion: percentiles
...n period It started from less than five percentile and remained constant from the year 199...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01492537313 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71805756649 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 201.0 22.4926829268 894% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1008.0 112.824112599 893% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 201.0 22.9334400587 876% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 33.0 5.23603664747 630% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120904004934 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120904004934 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.093654400644 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366041498659 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 102.7 13.2329268293 776% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -124.08 61.2550243902 -203% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 80.5 10.3012195122 781% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.26 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 17.77 8.06136585366 220% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 82.4 10.9970731707 749% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 56.0 11.0658536585 506% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.