This report is going to summaries the information presented of the bar graph compared the percentage of the natives of five different countries, who immigrated to Australia in three years 1992, 1982 and 2002.
After giving a quick look on the graph, it is conspicuous that the maximum percentage of Italians, who immigrated to Australia in the first and the last given years, whereas, this statistics of immigrants was the highest, who came from Vietnam in the year 1982.
Giving a cursory glance on the bar graph, it is explicity observed that in 1962, roughly two-fifth of total Italians immigrated to Australia, which was the maximum proportion among all the given nations. It is interesting to depict that the percentage of the people of United Kingdom and Vietnam, was similar, who immigrated to Australia.
After the period of two decades, 5% more people of Vietnam than Italy, immigrated to the various provinces of Australia. The percentage of Indians was almost 15%, which was three times more than New Zealanders, who immigrated to Australia. In 2002, the proportion of Australian immigrants was 15% and approximately 7%, who came from Italy and New Zealand respectively.
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food. 56
- some people say government should subsidised the fruits and vegetables to make healthy food cheaper. Some other say it should be tax to unhealthy food. 56
- The graph below shows the percentage of immigrants to Australia from countries in 1962 1982 and 2002 83
- The bar chart below shows the production of the world’s oil in OPEC and non-OPEC countries.Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...irst and the last given years, whereas, this statistics of immigrants was the highes...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 998.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17098445596 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90498501856 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1422700554 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.571428571 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5714285714 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324978194797 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162145332587 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536575043806 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216866540952 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263979951251 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.