The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

This report is going to summaries the information presented on line graph compared the theft of cars in four different nations from the year 1990 to 1999.

After giving a quick look on graph, it is clear that the number of car theft fell down in every country (Sweden, France and Canada) except Great Britain over a given period of 10 years.

Giving a cursory glance on line graph, it is manifest that in 1990, about 17,000 cars were theft in Great Britain. After two years, this data surge steadily to 20,000. Then after some fluctuations, it reached to almost 16,000 vehicles in 1999. In 1990, there were around 9,000 theft of cars in Sweden followed by approximately 8,000 thefts of vehicles in Canada.The number of car theft rose gradually to 15,000 in 1999 in Sweden. In the contrary, Canada showed downward trend. there was a steady declined in the number of car thefts, it was 7,000 cars in 1990 to 6,000 cars in 1999.

Turning to France, the data of car theft was 5,500 cars in 1990. Between 1990 and 1991, the theftness of cars soared steeply to 7,000 cars. After that, this figure declined to 6,000 in 1993 and then, it approached to again 5,500 cars till the end.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...down in every country Sweden, France and Canada except Great Britain over a given...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...tely 8,000 thefts of vehicles in Canada.The number of car theft rose gradually to 1...
^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...contrary, Canada showed downward trend. there was a steady declined in the number of ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6,000 in 1993 and then, it approached to again 5,500 cars till the end.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62085308057 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22898003886 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545023696682 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.6356696688 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.63636363636 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180479633509 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847759337723 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676630306359 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134473541962 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729693021065 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 86.03 61.2550243902 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.52 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.