The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age group who went to the cinema once a month in Great Britain. Summerize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant.
The given diagram depicts information regarding the proportion of Great British in various age groups going to the movies every month during the 1984-2000 period.
Overall, there was an increase in the percentage of moviegoers in four age brackets, while a mild fluctuation was obviously seen in the data of the 25-35 age group. In addition, the age between 15 and 24 generally had the highest figure throughout the period.
Regarding people from 15 to 24 years old, the figure started at 16% in 1984, after which it witnessed a significant rise to 56% in 1999 and reached a vertex in 2000, recording exactly 58%.
Concerning the youngest age group which is 7-14, the percentage of moviegoers was 10% in 1984, then it increased three times higher in 1999. Afterward, it underwent a slight decline in 2000, culminating at 32%.
4% was the proportion of people in the 25-35 age group in Great Britain who went to the cinema in 1984, with a subsequent jump to the pinnacle of around 36% after ten years before it remained unaltered during the 1994-1999 period.
In view of moviegoers over the age of 35, the figure for it experienced negligible movements between 1984 and 1994. Afterward, it moved in parallel with the age group of 15-24, ending at 16% in 2000.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in an European country betwwwn 1999 to 2004 78
- The maps below show a beachfront area in Australia in 1950 and today 67
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it is a positive trend while others think it is a negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 84
- The diagrams show changes in a student common room 78
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88073394495 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66873149024 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550458715596 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9666555481 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.222222222 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164859727456 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690493354432 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538923698492 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909029416036 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505885874782 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.