The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005
The diagram illustrates how the price of 800 grams of four categories of bread in one particular European nation changed during the 2001-2005 period, starting from 2001. Units were measured in Euros.
Overall, there was an increase in the price of brown, white, and rye bread, while wholegrain bread witnessed a drastic fluctuation in the examined period. In addition, brown bread had the highest figure.
Regarding wholegrain bread, the price started at 0.8 in 2001, after which it basically doubled, reaching its pinnacle of $1.8. Afterward, the price witnessed a considerable decline, before ending the period at 0.8 in 2005.
The figure for brown bread was 0.6 in 2001. It moved in parallel with rye and white bread, reaching its vertex at 1.6 in 2003. Subsequently, the price fluctuated marginally, registering at 1.6.
0.6 Euros was the price of white bread in 2001, then it experienced a twofold rise in 2004, before ending the period at 1.5 in 2005. Meanwhile, the figure for rye bread experienced negligible movements, recording 0.7 in 2005.
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 70
- More and more people want to buy clothes cars and other products from well known brands What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative trend 24 02 2019 78
- The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2005 73
- The price of 800 grams of four kinds of bread in a particular European country 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19186046512 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74287389796 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.6988116873 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304379915334 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118133033132 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107593447317 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180630390527 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0988323897238 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.