The graph below shows the percentage of people in diffrent age group who went to the cinema one a month in Great Britain, Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of people split by four age brackets going to the cinema once a month in Great Britain from 1984 to 2000.
Overall, the percentage of cinema attendance in all age categories experienced an upward trend. It is clear that the 15-24 age group consistently had the largest proportion of attendees to the cinema, while the figure for the 35 and plus were the lowest over the period examined.
The share of cinema goers of the 15-24 age group started at around 18%, after which it saw a dramatic growth to nearly 55% in 1999 before ending the period at shy of 60%. The figure for the youngest age group (7-14 years old) saw a relatively similar change in the first 15 years, rising from 10% in 1984 to roughly 38% in 1999 and followed by a gradual decline to about 32% in the final year.
Around 4% of the 25-35 years old attended to the cinema in 1984, with a subsequent six-fold increase to 24% 10 years later and a final rise to north of 30% at the end of the period. Similar changes, but to a lesser extent, can be seen in the figure for those aged 35 and over, which grew steadily from about 1% in 1984 to 15% in 2000.
- Many criminals commit further crime as soon as they are released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in diffrent age group who went to the cinema one a month in Great Britain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 84
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some industrialized countries have serious environmental problems The damage to the environment is an inevitable result when a country tends to improve the standard of living To what extend do you agree 78
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... first 15 years, rising from 10% in 1984 to roughly 38% in 1999 and followed by a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 944.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.31050228311 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27710627454 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566210045662 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1126355862 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.857142857 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134548156665 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073589562758 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581680362743 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102115763241 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640482194479 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.31 11.4140731707 73% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.