The graph below shows percentage of workers in five European countries taking fixed stays or more sickness absence per year from 1991 to 2001

Essay topics:

The graph below shows percentage of workers in five European countries taking fixed stays or more sickness absence per year from 1991 to 2001.

The given line graph illustrates the proportion of workers with illness absence in five European countries between 1991 to 2001.
What stands out from the graph is that while the ratio of employees non appearing in Netherlands and Sweden witnessed a progress, the number of people away from work in France reduced over the same period. Besides, the rate of absent workers in Germany was always the lowest.
Starting at the highest point in 1991 with 5% before the data of workers with illness absence saw a fluctuation and then it surged significantly to roughly 5,5% in 2001. Following that was the people away from work in France with roughly 4,7%. After rising a little bit and also surpassing the Netherlands in the first year, the rate of workers with illness absence dropped considerably to exactly 3% in 2001. Ranked at the third was the number of absent workers in Sweden with lower 1,7% in comparison with France. The figure for Sweden first kept stable and then progressed to roughly 4,5% in the last year.
Turning to the other two countries which were at the bottom of the chart. The statistics of people away from work in the UK was roughly 2.7% and also higher than Germany 1,2% in 1991. Surprisingly, both of the countries reached a plateau at 2.7% and 1,5% throughout the period shown respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-19 Giang Tran 73 view
Essays by user Giang Tran :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 144, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eden witnessed a progress, the number of people away from work in France reduced ...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...rance with roughly 4,7%. After rising a little bit and also surpassing the Netherlands in ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, then, third, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81497797357 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51075816001 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519823788546 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6556459596 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3636363636 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36363636364 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211843784963 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837078631601 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078769924554 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153181822362 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944644100041 0.0819641961636 115% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.