The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000.
The graph provided illustrates the levels of pollution caused by sulphur dioxide and smoke in London from 1600 to 2000.
Overall, the amount of sulphur dioxide was always higher than that of smoke within the given years. The sulphur dioxide level had shown fluctuation in increase, whereas smoke level had grown steadily until 1870, before both declining more or less to 0 around 1990.
Firstly, the sulphur dioxide level had increased rapidly from around 1580 to 1730 with becoming just over 750 micrograms. Following that, while fluctuating until about 1880, it had reached the peak point (approximately 850) around 1840. Then it had experienced a sharp fall, up till 2000 and also had shown some sudden falls and rises among the amount of smoke between the years of 1940 and 1990.
The smoke level had almost performed the same trend as sulphur dioxide but only kept rising till about 1870 where it reached the highest amount with more or less 400. Subsequently, it had gone down sharply and almost became 0 around 1980.
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 39
- The charts below show the results of a survey about what people of different age groups say makes them most happy 89
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alls and rises among the amount of smoke between the years of 1940 and 1990. The...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, so, then, whereas, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94219653179 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28201474566 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624277456647 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0585402038 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.875 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148417420643 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764804019146 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121833165063 0.0843802449381 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134944748884 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147985101754 0.0819641961636 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.