The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007.
The table given reveals data about the global market share of a different brand of notebooks within two years, 2006 and 2007.
Overall, there are six notebook manufacturers which are HP, Dell, Acer, Toshiba, Lenovo, Fujitsu-Siemens (F-S) and the ones that are not referred in the chart classed as others. HP, has the greatest proportion of worldwide market share whilst F-S has the lowest for both years. Unlike Acer, Lenovo, F-S and the other brands, HP, Dell and Toshiba increased within the given period.
The manufacturers, those who increased their global market share from 2006-2007, are HP from well below a third (31.4%) to just over a third (34%), Dell from 16.6% to 20.2% and finally Toshiba a slight increase from 6.2% to 7.3%.
Now, turning to brands whose market share shrunk within the provided time period are Others from 22.8% to 19.3%, Acer and Lenovo experienced a slight drop from 11.6% to 10.7% and 6.6% to 6.2% respectively and finally, F-S lost more than half of its market share from 4.8% to 2.3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | faraj27 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Theagh | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | cnade95 | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | raminghorbanii | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | bhullarb476@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 39
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 96
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of students who passed their high school competency exams, by subject and gender, during the period 2010-2011. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, third, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 846.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86206896552 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38543827454 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620689655172 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8422687294 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 112.824112599 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275682968041 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142778290171 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974225893245 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174845977536 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659684620223 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.5 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.