The graph below shows the population change between 1940 and 2000 in three different counties in the U S state of Oregon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

At first glance, the provided line graph enumerates information about the changes of population in three several countries during six decades in the u.s state of Oregon.

Looking more closely at the graph, it is noted that Washington hold the highest figures of population in all the followed years which was around 75 thousands in 1940.After that, it grew impressively and reached to nearly 135 thousands in the next year and then, the figures substantially swelled to 240 thousand in the last decade

Moving toward the next category, the numbers of Columbia and yam hill population were quiet similar and had seen noticeable changes where both countries had around 30 thousands people in 1940.Afterward, the figures escalated gradually in 1970 and reached to 75 thousand and 90 thousand in 2000 respectively

In conclusion then, one can say that over a period of 60 years, the figures of Washington marked on upward trend as compared to other countries.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (6 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: After
...s which was around 75 thousands in 1940.After that, it grew impressively and reached ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... then, the figures substantially swelled to 240 thousand in the last decade Mo...
^^
Line 5, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... similar and had seen noticeable changes where both countries had around 30 thous...
^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Afterward
... had around 30 thousands people in 1940.Afterward, the figures escalated gradually in 197...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of 60 years, the figures of Washington marked on upward trend as compared to ot...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, look, then, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14649681529 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84216354676 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 2.0 8.94146341463 22% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 78.0 22.4926829268 347% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 311.0 43.030603864 723% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 404.0 112.824112599 358% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 78.5 22.9334400587 342% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.0 5.23603664747 363% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135582076677 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138834876893 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644837234758 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842446682972 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751520096152 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 42.1 13.2329268293 318% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 0.77 61.2550243902 1% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 32.5 10.3012195122 315% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.77 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.06136585366 139% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.5 11.4329268293 258% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 33.2 10.9970731707 302% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 33.0 11.0658536585 298% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.