The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the data about how the populations of India and China have changed since 2000 and the 2050 projection.
In general, the population of India will experience an upward trend while China will suffer a downward trend. In addition, in the first thirty years, the population of China has outnumbered India’s. However, this pattern will be reversed in the next twenty years.
Looking at the details between 2000 and 2030, we can see that China's population has steadily increased, reaching around 1.45 billion in 2025 and remaining stable at this level for the next five years. Similarly, India’s figures have soared to the same level as China’s, though it started at a position of 1 billion, which is much lower than China’s (1.25 billion).
Between 2030 and 2050, whereas the figure of India will continue to soar and peak at 1,6 billion, China’s figure will decline significantly and consistently below 1,4 billion in 2050.
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarise the Information by selecting end reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Many jobs require ongoing training and research to stay competitive in a world with rapidly evolving information and technology Some believe that it is the responsibility of businesses to pay for this training for their staff while others feel it is up to 89
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 67
- More and more people are seriously overweight Some people suggest the solution to this problem is to increase the price of fattening foods To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, similarly, so, whereas, while, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 798.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08280254777 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59450762892 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662420382166 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1887222777 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4285714286 5.23603664747 218% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230509106769 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116898144568 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692127839326 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156791741065 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505043957211 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.