The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000.
The line chart illustrates the output of three different heat sources in a European nation between 1981 and 2000.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that there was an uptrend in both resources, namely Natural Gas and Petroleum, of which the rose level in Natural Gas was strongest. Meanwhile, the opposite was true for Coal.
In 1981, the production level of petroleum was highest, at almost 100 tons, standing second location was Coal with 80 tons. Throughout the period to be surveyed, both of these fuels witnessed a dramatic oscillation. Details, the amount of petroleum generated went up to 120 tonnes in 1982 and not unchanged until 1987 before significantly decreasing to about 90 tons in 1992. After that, it raised up again to over 120 tons at the end of the period. The quantity of coal manufactured remarkably fell down to around 50 tons in 1985 and recovered up rough 70 tons in 1987. From 1987 onwards, the figure gradually went down year by year and reached the lowest point of nearly 40 tons in 2000.
About the resting fuel, Natural Gas produced remain unchanged from 1981 to 1994 at 40 tons. Then, this figure doubled up above 80 tons in 2000.
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 89
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week Does this development have more positive or negative effects on both individuals and society 89
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Some people say that the increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development while others think that many countries will lose their national identities as a result Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- With the fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7756097561 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55246437007 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619512195122 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0235467884 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158065123129 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551880059969 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502256191949 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10349589976 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373266755779 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.