The line chart below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000.
The line chart illustrates how a European nation manufacture three different main fuels between 1981 and 2000.
Overall, there was an increase in the the production levels of petroleum and natural gas, with the most dramatic rise being seen in the latter. In contrast, the production of coal experienced a decrease over the given timeframe.
Looking at the chart in more detail, in 181, natural gas was the smallest fuel being produced, with negligible figures of 40 tonnes. Thereafter, natural gas maintained a marginal presence in production, at just 40 tonnes until 1995, after which its production increased, reaching a peak of over 80 tonnes in 2000. Meanwhile, petroleum was the leading fuel in production, twice the figure for natural gas in 1981. In the following years, the figure for petroleum underwent a significant fluctuation, and finally reached at 120 tonnes in 2000.
With regard to the remaining fuel, in 1981, 80 tonnes of coal were manufactured, the figure for coal boomed out at around 50 tonnes in 1985 before a modest recovery to around 70 tonnes in the following years. Finally, the production levels of coal sharply decreased to under 40 tonnes by the end of the period.
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 61
- The bar chart shows the number of cars per 1000 people in 5 European countries in 3 years and compares with the European average Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150
- The chart shows the proportion of people in a UK survey carried out in three different years who said they were interested in certain sports 67
- The line graph and table show the average monthly temperatures and annual hours of sunshine in three major cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- The graph gives information about the drinking habits of the US population by age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...000. Overall, there was an increase in the the production levels of petroleum and natu...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 35, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...000. Overall, there was an increase in the the production levels of petroleum and natu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, while, in contrast, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02512562814 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78455446927 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1811795147 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208148701717 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974966224509 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920055135578 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15729010876 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113470323247 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.