The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Measured in tonnes.
The given illustration depicts the main fuel production levels in one European nation between 1981 and 2000. It is clear that production of coal dropped remarkably while those of Petroleum and natural gas considerably went up.
Over the 20-year span since 1981, although Petroleum production experienced a wide fluctuation of which the peak and the nadir were at 137 and 99 tonnes respectively, the production number reached just over 120 tonnes in 2000. Meanwhile, natural gas production of the country reached a plateau at 40 tonnes in the first 14 years, followed by an abrupt surge of 100 % over the half of a decade.
By comparison, production of coal decreased from 80 in 1981 to roughly 40 tonnes in 2000 - a 50 % shrinkage - during the period. Due to this decline, coal became the least preferred source of fuel, and 1997 marked the first time ever that natural gas production officially exceeded that of coal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000. Measured in tonnes. 78
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 66
- Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university. 73
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 (percentage) 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 219, Rule ID: FIRST_TIME_EVER[1]
Message: Use simply 'first time'.
Suggestion: first time
...red source of fuel, and 1997 marked the first time ever that natural gas production officially ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00649350649 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78662915275 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 217.8 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0100681773 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243130524286 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129851586305 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107421545732 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170205371788 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064921704822 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.