The graph below shows the proportion of aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The following graph illustrates the percentage of three distinctive countries’ population who were 65 and over during a century from 1940 to 2040.
As can be clearly observed from the graph, three different countries of Japan, USA, and Sweden are surveyed. First of all, USA had the highest percentage by near 10% in 1940, it increased significantly to 15% till 1980. The proportion of American people who were 65 and over experienced a gradual decline until 2020, while the projection shows a dramatic rise to about 25% in 2040. Turning to Sweden, it initiated around 7% in 1940, then went up significantly to 15% by 1970. After a slight decline to 13%, the pattern followed a dramatic climb to about 20% in 2020. Although in will decrease during next decade, the final percentage will be nearly 25% by 2040.
Regarding Japan, unlike Sweden and USA, the people of Japan who aged 65 and over witnessed a remarkable fall from 5% in 1940 to 3% in 1980. From 1990 onward, there was a sharp rise and it almost doubled (10%). By 2040, figure will become more than 25%.
Overall, it is clear from the graph that, whereas Japan had far less 65 aged and over population than USA and Sweden until 2020, the project depicts that the increase of aging in Japan will be far sharper and by 2040 it will exceed both USA and Sweden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...tes the percentage of three distinctive countries population who were 65 and over during ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, then, whereas, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 235.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44680851064 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49165560795 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497872340426 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 235.0 22.4926829268 1045% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1045.0 112.824112599 926% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 235.0 22.9334400587 1025% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 56.0 5.23603664747 1070% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19133042207 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19133042207 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139400635835 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482804341911 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 117.0 13.2329268293 884% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -141.67 61.2550243902 -231% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 91.4 10.3012195122 887% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.01 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.18 8.06136585366 226% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 11.4329268293 507% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 96.0 10.9970731707 873% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 11.0658536585 524% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.