The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The linear chart exhibits the percentage of glass containers, aluminium cans, paper and card board, plastics that were recycled in one country during the time period.
Overall, it can clearly seen from the chart the glass container, paper and cardboard reused ratio were highest as compared to the others materials.
Primarily, it is vividly apparent that in 1982 the paper and cardboard recycled proportion were nearby 70% whereas, the glass containers ratio were half in same year. Both were shown the fluctuation in 8 year after that the paper reused percent reached at the peak of 80%. Then, it was declined continuously in the last years and it percentage was stayed at 70%. While, the glass containers renew per centum was reached at 60% in 2010 before, showed same decrement in 1994 it was almost fifty.
Furthermore, recycling of aluminium cans and plastics were introduced in 1986 and 1990. The foremost case, it was started at 5% but, this figured climbed rapidly over the 25 years an it was reached at 45%. On the latter case, it was stable at the same proportion, and showed some minor increment over the time it was 5% to 10%.
- People have different job expectations for jobs some people prefer to do the same job for the same company whereas others prefer to change jobs frequently. Write about the advantages and disadvantages of each viewpoint. 56
- Some people believe that playing a musical instrument can be beneficial in many different ways. Others think it is a waste of time to play a musical instrument. Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- Tourism has negative impact on certain destinations some people believe that particular tourists are to be blamed for that discuss the specific negative impact I your country and suggest solutions 78
- Talk about a situtatiin when you cheated by someone 56
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, aluminium cans, paper and card board, plastics that were recycled in one count...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'containers'' or 'container's'?
Suggestion: containers'; container's
...tion were nearby 70% whereas, the glass containers ratio were half in same year. Both were...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own the fluctuation in 8 year after that the paper reused percent reached at the ...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t 70%. While, the glass containers renew per centum was reached at 60% in 2010 be...
^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'it'?
Suggestion: an; it
...gured climbed rapidly over the 25 years an it was reached at 45%. On the latter case,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84183673469 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50024467774 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1701181317 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.444444444 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132432582 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060589427525 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506186062675 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785703227129 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267100841466 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.