The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.

The given line graph demonstrates the recycled percentage of four types of materials in one country between 1980 and 2010.

Overall, most materials experienced an upward trend throughout the timeline. While the paper percentage was the highest, plastics one was the lowest.

From 1980 to 1994, both recycled paper and glass products fluctuated in number and hit their lowest point at about 50% and 40% respectively. In the end, paper percentage showed a decrease to 70% and glass contradictorily peaked at 60%.

On the other hand, people started to recycle aluminum cans one year later and plastics two years later in comparison with the two mentioned materials. Among the four of them, Aluminum increased fastest from 5% in 1986 to 45% in 2010. However, plastics was the slowest to grow when barely reached 10% after a 20-year period

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 710.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 138.0 196.424390244 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14492753623 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.42743929552 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69175345304 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 200.7 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.231188427 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.75 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162969178258 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687831415806 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717191134553 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100801492732 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709986647168 0.0819641961636 87% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.