The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The supplied linear schedule delineates information about a particular country recycling materials such as: paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics during the year 1982 to 2010. The data is calibrated in percentum.
To commence with, it it seen that, paper and cardboard was the materials which was recycled the maximum with highest 80% in the year 1992. Furthermore, glass containers were second most recycled products with peak point 70% and least with 40% in the year 2008. Similarly, both the products were never less than 40% among all the years.
Probing ahead, aluminium cans were having low percentage in the starting years, but inclined rapidly in the upcoming years and reached peak point of 45%. Moreover, plastics was the only material which was not recycled more than 9% , while it was between 1% to 9% only, between the years 1982 to 2010.
Overall, it is evident that, plastic was the material which was minimum recycled, compared to other materials, because it contains a man made chemical called BPA which can not be properly recycled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-27 | Paramdeepsingh | 61 | view |
- Many people believe that the use of new technology improves lives of employees. Other think it's a disadvantage for them. Discuss both point of views and give your opinion. 67
- The birth rate in most developed countries is predicted to begin to fall over the next 50 years. By 2030 it is estimated that over one third of the population in most developed countries will be aged 65 and over. What effects will these predictions have o 100
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment. 73
- The chart below gives information about southland main exports in 2000, 20.... and future projections for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant.(20... for test purposes, use and refer t 56
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...ated in percentum. To commence with, it it seen that, paper and cardboard was the ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rial which was not recycled more than 9% , while it was between 1% to 9% only, bet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, second, similarly, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14689265537 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54680339829 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3407384182 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.875 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116241564843 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051119684458 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439423992005 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764864275476 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425343330938 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.